The Afghan-Iranian Border Dispute: A Battle Over Water
A Historical Dispute Over a Vital Resource
The escalating tensions on the Afghan-Iranian border, particularly near the city of Zaran, have brought global attention to an enduring dispute. Rather than a territorial quarrel, this conflict centers on water rights in the Sistan Basin, an issue that has been a geopolitical flashpoint since the 1870s. The Helmand River, the main point of contention, originates in Afghanistan and culminates in eastern Iran.
Over the past few decades, there has been a significant drop in rainfall, leading to the drying up of the Hamun lakes. Climate change threatens to transform the region into a permanent dust bowl, amplifying existing political issues such as border security, refugee flows, Islamic militancy, and illicit goods trafficking. The environmental crisis is intensifying unease, mistrust, and anxiety between Afghanistan and Iran.
The Helmand River: A Life Source Amidst Conflict
Despite 95% of the Helmand River traversing Afghan territory, decisions made upstream have serious ramifications for the Iranian Hamuns downstream. The river is vital for regional agriculture, and the dispute over its use has been exacerbated by a British-imposed border since the mid-19th century. Both nations have attempted to establish water rights, but no final agreement has been reached.
The 1973 Helmand Water Treaty comes closest to a binding agreement. It allows Iran to draw 22 cubic meters of water from the river per second, with the option to purchase an additional four cubic meters per second during regular rainfall years. However, the treaty was not ratified, and enforcement depends on goodwill—an attribute as scarce as the water itself in the region.
Political Discord Fuels the Fire
Political unrest in Afghanistan and Iran, including the 1973 Afghan coup, the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the Soviet-Afghan War, the U.S.-led Afghan occupation, and the rise and subsequent reemergence of the Taliban, have added to the obstacles. Consequently, long-term infrastructure planning has been sporadic. Much of Afghanistan’s water infrastructure remains as holdover works primarily completed by American engineering firms in the 1950s.
Global Ripple Effects and Potential Solutions
Although the conflict between Iran and Afghanistan may seem distant, it has global ripple effects. Rising American household debt levels and uncertainty over interest rates could undermine the investments of the upper-middle class, leading them to seek safe-haven assets. One such asset is museum-grade fine art masterworks, which can be accessed online and are believed to appreciate in value. With services handling everything from authentication to acquisition and storage, individuals can invest in works from artists like Picasso, Banksy, and Basquiat. Their 15 sales to date have all returned profits to their investors.
Seeking Resolution Amidst Escalating Tensions
Recent escalations have led to heightened exchanges between Iran and Afghanistan. The Iranian President has asserted his country’s water rights and urged the Taliban to allow Iranian hydrologists to check the water levels of the river. On the other hand, the Taliban’s foreign minister has emphasized the importance of face-to-face talks to resolve the issue.
The situation has been tense since 2021, with the opening of the Kamal Khan Dam in Afghanistan’s Chahar Burjak district. While drought-stricken Iran views the dam as an environmental concern, Afghanistan argues that the dams secure water for it in line with the 1973 treaty.
As the tension persists, both nations need to find a sustainable solution that respects the rights and needs of both parties. The dispute over the Helmand River is not just about water—it’s about the very survival of the people who depend on it.
Subscribe to BNN Breaking
Sign up for our daily newsletter covering global breaking news around the world.