Struggles for Recognition: The Case of Romuva in Lithuania

Struggles for Recognition: The Case of Romuva in Lithuania

Lithuanian Parliament Rejects Recognition of Romuva

The Lithuanian Parliament has recently dismissed a proposal to grant state recognition to Romuva, an association practicing a form of ancient Baltic pagan faith. The proposal did not pass the second reading, receiving 48 votes in favor, 31 against, and 30 abstentions. Further, a vote on whether to send the draft resolution for improvement was also rejected.

Alternative Resolution Proposed

Tomas Vytautas Raskevičius, chairman of the Seimas Committee on Human Rights, announced his intention to propose an alternative draft resolution. This would allow the Parliament to formally refuse Romuva recognition. Raskevičius noted the law necessitates the Seimas to make a decision either to recognize or not. If the religious association disagrees with the decision, it has the right to appeal.

(Read Also: Border Control and Entry Restrictions: A Year After Implementation in Lithuania)

A Historical Battle for Recognition

Several years ago, the same parliament failed to adopt a resolution granting state recognition to Romuva. In response, the association took the case to the European Court of Human Rights and emerged victorious.

Under Lithuanian law, non-traditional religious associations can seek state recognition as part of the country’s historical, spiritual, and social heritage. However, they must meet certain criteria: they must have public support, and their teachings and rites must not contradict the law and morality. State recognition constitutes a form of support for the spiritual, cultural, and social heritage of religious associations. A religious association can apply for state recognition no sooner than 25 years after its initial registration in Lithuania.

(Read Also: Unrest in Lithuania’s Educational Sector: Teachers Demand Better Pay and Working Conditions)

Symbolic of a Larger Struggle

The recent rejection of the proposal signifies the ongoing struggle for recognition of non-traditional religious associations in Lithuania. Despite legal provisions allowing non-traditional religious associations to seek state recognition, the reality appears more complex. The case of Romuva brings to light the challenges such groups face in their attempts to gain official recognition and legitimacy.

(Read Also: Regulating the Media Landscape: A Case Study of Lithuania’s Competition Council’s Decision)

Conclusion

The case of Romuva represents a broader issue of recognition and acceptance of non-traditional religious associations in societies worldwide. It serves as a reminder that while laws may provide a framework for recognition, societal attitudes, perceptions, and interpretations of these laws often play a more significant role in the actual granting of recognition. As such, the struggle of non-traditional religious associations like Romuva continues, reflecting the complexities and nuances of societal acceptance and recognition.