Global Security Threats: The Implications of Nuclear-Armed Russia and the Risk of Unauthorized Use

Global Security Threats: The Implications of Nuclear-Armed Russia and the Risk of Unauthorized Use

Unpacking the Historical Context

In the aftermath of the Cold War, Ukraine took a historical decision to dismantle its nuclear arsenal, which was the third largest in the world at the time. This decision led to an international consensus that Russia, as a successor state of the Soviet Union, should be entrusted with this formidable power. This move, however, has not been without controversy, with critics arguing that it is Russia that should have been disarmed, given its history of aggressive behavior towards its neighbors. Today, the fear is that Russia’s possession of nuclear weapons is as dangerous as them being in the hands of terrorists, posing a significant global security threat.

(Read Also: Russian Federation Reintroduces COVID-19 Restrictions Amid Surge of Cases)

The Dangers of Nuclear Weapons in the Wrong Hands

Recent events have underscored the potential for Russia’s nuclear arsenal to fall into the wrong hands. Concerns have been raised about the possibility of private militaries or other rogue actors gaining access to the Kremlin’s atomic stockpile, especially in the event of a crisis of authority or a collapse of the state. While the exact details are murky, Russia’s nuclear command and control likely makes it difficult for a rogue actor to use its weapons or acquire enough nuclear material to make one. However, the danger lies not only in the potential use of these nuclear weapons but also in their potential sale on the black market or their use in a “dirty bomb.”

Nuclear Weapons and Command and Control Procedures

In order to prevent unauthorized uses or employment, nuclear-armed states have developed command and control (C2) or NC2 procedures that outline who can legally authorize a nuclear strike employment and who has the ability to operationalize a strike. Russia’s C2, while somewhat murky, does have some similarities with that of the United States. The decision to use nuclear weapons in Russia is taken by the President of the Russian Federation. However, the specifics of how authorization happens are unclear. For instance, it is not known whether the Russian president needs consent from the defense minister and the chief of the General Staff or just one to authorize a launch.

(Read Also: Fire at Fuel Tank in Russia’s Sochi Resort Extinguished, No Casualties Reported – Mayor)

Belarus: A New Stage for Nuclear Saber-Rattling

The recent announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin to station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus has drawn international criticism. While Putin insists that the move does not violate nuclear nonproliferation agreements, NATO and Ukraine have decried it as dangerous and irresponsible. Critics argue that the move is likely an attempt to intimidate Ukraine’s allies and to divert attention from Russia’s difficulties on the battlefield in Ukraine.

The West’s Response to Russia’s Nuclear Posturing

The West’s reaction to Putin’s nuclear saber-rattling has been critical but measured. Both the National Security Council and the State Department have stated that they have not seen any reason to adjust their own strategic nuclear posture, nor any indications Russia is preparing to use a nuclear weapon. However, NATO and the European Union have condemned Putin’s plans, with the latter threatening to respond with further sanctions.

(Also Read: Russia Strikes Ukraine’s Kremenchuk Oil Refinery in Drone Attack, Igniting Fire – Governor)

Conclusion: A Looming Global Security Threat

The world is currently grappling with the potential implications of a nuclear-armed Russia. The risk of these weapons falling into the wrong hands or being used in a manner that escalates conflict is a significant global security concern. While safeguards are in place to prevent unauthorized use, the murkiness of Russia’s command and control procedures does little to assuage these fears. As the international community continues to monitor this situation closely, it is clear that the issue of nuclear weapons and global security will remain a pressing concern in the foreseeable future.